n the UK today 9.6% of 5-16 year
old children and young people have a mental disorder
(ONS 2004). This means a condition that affects
daily living and which does not get better in a
few weeks. A disorder will not usually remit without
professional help and can seriously affect both
the child and the family. It is more prevalent
in boys than girls. Girls tend to catch up in the
higher ages groups, but more boys find their way
into the justice system, where over 90% have mental
health problems (ONS 2000). Looked after children
i.e. those in public care, are also at greater
risk with studies showing between half to 80% with
a mental disorder.
The scandal of children’s mental health
problems is two-fold. If such vast numbers of children
as this had a serious and lengthy physical illness
there would be a public outcry. This has not happened
for these children. Secondly many adults with mental
illness display symptoms in childhood but do not
access treatment. Studies show that teachers and
GPs did not recognise the presentation. Children’s
mental health is everybody’s business, from
those who directly work in mental health services,
through all those working with children in any
setting, to all of us who have any contact at all
with the young. The bulk of mental health support
for children and young people is delivered through
the family and through schools. The way in which
these early years and education services take up
their responsibilities in relation to children’s
mental health is critical for us all.
Increasingly it is accepted that the essential
building blocks for mental health are put in place
at the earliest stages of life – there is
some evidence to suggest that what goes on in the
womb is also highly relevant. Children are not
all born with equally easy temperaments and from
the start require sensitive parenting that attunes
to their differing needs and meets them appropriately.
Where this does not happen, or is not ‘good
enough’ things begin to look bleak for the
child’s mental health.
It is reasonable to assume that all parents want
the best for their children but parents who do
not develop a consistent approach to parenting,
who cannot provide a stable and loving home, who
are pre-occupied with their own difficulties and
cannot slowly and appropriately encourage their
child to independence are likely to be putting
their children at risk of poor mental health. Factors
such as poverty and bereavement are significant
risk factors. This is not to say that poverty per
se engenders poor mental health but that, where
families are struggling with extreme poverty and
all that follows, they cannot always effectively
meet the child’s need for attention, closeness
and love. Similarly it is not the loss of a parent
that destroys the mental health of the child so
much as the fact that good parenting and a secure
home environment are often removed. It is this
security, consistency and unconditional love which
are the essential ingredients of mental health.
The mental health of children and young people
is one of the greatest health concerns in the western
world. Not all mental disorders are on the increase,
but instances of depression and conduct disorder
are rising. Conduct disordered behaviour is probably
the least well understood of all mental disorders
and illnesses. It is dismissed by many – professionals
included, as bad behaviour and naughtiness, when
in fact the behaviours that these young people
present are outward signs of inward damage, usually
at a much younger age. There are links with adult
personality disorder. The evidence base for treatments
is growing rapidly, but there are some treatments
which have a very slim research base, but which
are known to be effective through case studies
for some severely damaged young people, such as
psychodynamic psychotherapy. Because this treatment
is lengthy and requires a highly trained and skilled
practitioner to provide it, it is expensive and
scarce. Behavioural therapy – which takes
place over a much shorter time span, is seen to
be more cost effective. For children, young people
and families who are the most challenging and vulnerable
the evidence suggests that a multi-faceted, multi-skilled
approach is necessary if real change is to be seen.
These multi-modal approaches are also expensive,
requiring the input of several practitioners with
diverse skills and roles. It is likely that support
will be needed over a sustained period, with the
child and family needing to come back for further
support from time to time – much as with
a physical condition such as asthma.
Through the Government’s Change for Children
Programme (Every Child Matters and the National
Service Framework for Children, Young People and
Maternity Services) things are improving. Significant
investment has been made in Child and Adolescent
Mental Health Services (CAMHS) over the last 6
years. Government targets – to be met this
year – expect PCTs to ensure that they have
primary mental health workers in place, i.e. practitioners
working in the community to pick up and support
young people at the earlier stages, 24-hour on-call
support and services which target those young people
with dual diagnosis, particularly learning disability
and mental disorder. The recent progress report
shows that many PCTs have significantly improved
but that there are others that fall well short
of meeting these standards.
Concurrently there is recognition in policy documents
on children, parenting and youth that mental health
is an important ingredient of total wellbeing.
But we are all wary of using the word ‘mental’ for
fear of stigmatising and driving people away from
the best supports and services. Whilst there will
always be a need to use terminology that pulls
the person into help rather than away, we need
to rehabilitate the word ‘mental’ to
take its place beside its partner ‘physical’.
It is only by so doing that we will ensure that
the stigma is defeated and that those whose mental
health is bad feel able to ask for and receive
speedy, effective treatment. |